Comments

1. It's irrelevant

   Sure, she *could* have done something differently, but I don't see how that's very relevant. The (apparently convicted?) defendants assaulted their victim and maliciously created a situation that led to someone's death. If random passersby are obligated to save their victim, surely the defendants have an even greater obligation to do the same, given they're the ones who created the dangerous situation in the first place.

   5 months, 1 week ago In response to Samaritan or Killer?

Define what responsibility means to you.