Blog: Participate in the Discussion
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please login or create a profile.
Guest Authors
Categories
Recent Posts
- Cold But Not Cool: Time to Close the Door?
7/24/2008 - Should You Drink With Your Kids?
7/22/2008 - Growing Up
7/16/2008 - Just Rewards: Banking On It?
7/15/2008 - Review of New American Girl Movie
7/10/2008 - Too Old To Be Responsible?
7/08/2008 - Fertility Treatments: For Convenience?
7/03/2008 - Needling Questions: Immunizing Kids
7/01/2008 - Teen “Pregnancy Pact”: The Perfect Storm?
6/30/2008 - Parenting or Spying: Who’s Watching The Kids?
6/26/2008 - Murder, He Wrote
6/23/2008 - Spinning: Out of Control in the Gym?
6/19/2008 - Lighthouse
6/17/2008 - Having a Third Child
6/10/2008 - Hit and Run: Without a Compass
6/09/2008

Fiscal responsibility
Making money is critical to raising a family, it doesn't represent greed. In many parts of this country it is impossible to be fiscally responsible without 2 incomes. I am a big believer in birth control, abortion and limiting the size of one's family for environmental reasons as well as others. The world cannot take so many people as some families go on making. However even one child is expensive, especially with college costing $50K a year. Many parents can't afford rent or a mortgage and saving for college without working. Greed does not drive most working mothers. I highly recommend Montessori schools over nannies and wish more parents had this available for them. However, nannies and schools are not substitutes for mothering. To define them as such is creating a narrative that doesn't exist. They aid, assist, and enrich the parenting process. Not all nannies are good, and neither are all stay at home parents. Some are thoughtless and cruel and shove kids in front of TV. Good parenting is not defined by where a parent spends their time. There is no logic in this discussion when people define good mothering by place.