Blog: Participate in the Discussion
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please login or create a profile.
Categories
Recent Posts
- Safe Haven: Parents’ Bailout?
11/11/2008 - Paper or Plastic: When the Bill Comes Due
11/07/2008 - Vote: The Best Investment
11/03/2008 - Tony
10/30/2008 - The Responsibility Project Index
10/28/2008 - Criminalizing Motherhood?: Who’s to Judge
10/22/2008 - National Service: Do You Have a Responsibility to Help?
10/15/2008 - Jail for Sagging Pants: Fashion Police?
10/08/2008 - Hearing the Call
10/06/2008 - ‘Too Good’ to Play Baseball? Game Over
10/02/2008 - Children and Chores: How Much?
9/29/2008 - Renting a Dog: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
9/24/2008 - Hurricane Hold-Outs: Rising Tide?
9/23/2008 - Neighborhood Watch: Do You Really Know Who People Are?
9/19/2008 - Teachers With Guns: Don’t Mess With Texas?
9/15/2008
Guest Authors
Now Playing
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Feeds (What’s this?)
- © 2008 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 175 Berkeley Street, Boston MA 02116.
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
I question if it will work...however...
As mentioned in another comment on this page, when one's judgment is impaired, whether or not they even will be shamed remains to be seen. The "however" comes when I think about how one can be shamed when it is a matter of public record. I am sure that somewhere there is a website that allows me to see the men that ran Enron. Do they feel shame? Wasn't that the whole point of releasing the movie "Enron: The Smartest Guys In The Room," or, for that matter, "Sicko" or "Fahrenheit 911," to bring shame onto the parties that the filmmakers believed should be shamed? I guess that rather than having authorities trying to shame the guilty they should be more concerned with prosecuting them.