Blog: Participate in the Discussion
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please login or create a profile.
Categories
Now Playing
Dinner for Two
Sometimes, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one. Especially when you’re hungry.
Please note, due to licensing agreements, Dinner for Two is viewable in the U.S., Canada and England only. Watch this film »
Guest Authors
Recent Posts
- Fair Play: The Price of Victory?
8/29/2008 - Hot Seat
8/26/2008 - A Discussion with Hot Seat Creator, Janet Perlman
8/26/2008 - Right to Dry: Are Outdoor Clotheslines Going Extinct?
8/26/2008 - Going Green: Who Pays?
8/19/2008 - Class Action: Laptops Not Allowed
8/14/2008 - Brain Doping: Is Grey Matter an Ethical Matter?
8/12/2008 - Who Let the Dogs Out: Fetching Medicine?
8/07/2008 - Game, Set, Match, Responsibility
8/05/2008 - Pro Sports: Game of Second Chances?
7/31/2008 - Mothers With Guns: Packing Too Much?
7/29/2008 - Cold But Not Cool: Time to Close the Door?
7/24/2008 - Should You Drink With Your Kids?
7/22/2008 - Growing Up
7/16/2008 - Just Rewards: Banking On It?
7/15/2008

Why Compromise?
Compromise compromise compromise! The hardest thing to do is compromise, especially when you know you are right. Why should you “give up” being right when you know the other guy is wrong? Compromise can be a difficult thing to accept. I am not sure the video is correctly titled. What starts out as, "it is my dinner not yours" progresses to “I will share my dinner with both of you.” I also agree that the issue of whose meal it is raised lots of concerns in the “local community.” The video moves from a compromising opportunity to a lost opportunity to a sharing break. The frog does not play the roll of neutral party here. The frog is not offering a compromise because in the end he gets a third of the results. The frog now owns the meal and is choosing on his own free will to share. Relating this video to events of today, would you like to start with the war or the Democratic Party?