Killer Doctor
If your doctor was a convicted killer, would you trust him with your life?
Karl Svensson’s future as a doctor seemed certain when he was accepted to medical school at Sweden’s prestigious Karolinska Institute.
Famed for choosing the annual winners of the Nobel Prize in medicine, Karolinska hand-picked its medical students, selecting an elite group best suited for grappling with the ethics of life-or-death decisions and leading lives devoted to saving others.
But four months into Svensson’s studies, the 31 year-old’s future became unhinged by his past: would-be doctor Karl Svensson had killed a man.
Karolinska officials received two anonymous letters informing them that Svensson had been convicted of murder seven years earlier, shooting to death a trade union worker, in part because Svensson disagreed with the man’s politics. At the time, Svensson had been under surveillance by Sweden’s equivalent of the FBI for neo-Nazi involvement. Police classified the killing as a hate crime.
Svensson maintained his innocence, but was sentenced to 11 years in prison. After six and a half years, he was paroled, and soon accepted to med school.
The medical school could not expel Svensson because there was no government policy allowing for such action under the circumstances. Only when officials discovered that Svensson had falsified his high school transcripts by changing his last name from Hellekant—his legal name under which he was convicted—could they expel him. They did.
But students and officials remained divided. Some argued that a killer should never be allowed to practice medicine. Others said that since Svensson had served his time, he should be permitted to stay in school and become a doctor.
Tell us what you think: Should a man who was responsible for murder be allowed to be a doctor with the responsibility for saving people’s lives? Is it possible for a person to make a responsible contribution to society after making the most heinous one?
Add Comment Share This
Comments
Fontana
All I can say is he’s no different than those doctor’s that have malpractice suits hanging on their tails. He actually killed someone,served his time and wants to “help” others, while professional doctors walk around with a degree killing people due to neglect and(or) they still practice medicine and may or may not get a slap on the hand. What’s really worse the one who killed,served his time and wants to help or the ones who have a degree and kill? I’m not saying that I would trust the killer to operate on me, I question why he choose to be a doctor, I think it’s obvious why.
Kina Barnum | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Displacing a more deserving student
With the incredibly high number of qualified and deserving applicants to medical school and the relatively small number of available seats at medical schools, couldn’t Karolinska Institute find a more deserving student? There are many students who don’t come from “privileged” backgrounds and deserve a break in life but never get it! A physician’s tools for healing can just as easily be used for sinister purposes and giving a convicted murderer these same tools not only defies logic, but also gives me pause to rethink the wisdom of the Nobel Prize selection process itself. I wonder how thoroughly they investigate the backgrounds of their laureate candidates.
Tony | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Do You KNOW if he REALLY did it??
Its not likely anyone here was a witness to his crime. Forgiveness is what this sorry world lacks. I say he should practice, because he could indeed be the one, and that like any patient, everyone should shoulder up their OWN responsibility to research doctors when having medical attention. Use a doctor at your own discretion because, honestly if I’m in dire need of help and he can do it and is willing to, then who am I to shoot myself in the foot for judging a man i don’t even know. Its not highly likely he’s going to kill again knowing good and well he’s being watched and monitored.
Now, unless he killed the guy with a scalpel and pulled some Hannibal Lector stunt….then give the guy a chance to start anew and make amends for the life he allegedly took.
Mia | 1 year, 6 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Circumstantial Evidence Should Prevail
I would like to know the pure circumstances of this act before making a life decision for this individual.
Judith A. Eisner | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
God gave us the standard-The Bible
We have this wonderful little book, you know, and anybody can read for themselves what God thinks about stuff. I’m not the one to sentence him; the civil government should uphold God’s law. God does not change, neither His law, from Old Testament to the New. Forget the civilized society! Who decides on the standard in any society? The Fuhrer? Please understand that when man is law, tyranny and massacres come later from it.
viktor | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Ok lets let pedophile do whatever....
Because God will judge them anyway? Bro, we live in a real world, and real deeds are done here. Justice must be done here as much as possible, as much is known. American law is based on OT law, what part of GOD DOES NOT CHANGE don’t you understand?
viktor | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
A good view on that ...
A good view on that – appreciate hearing it. I wouldn’t believe in the death penalty myself, but the Bible does say something about the Leaders having authority…justice should be done, yes, and that would have to be whatever the leaders decide.
American Law is indeed very similar to Old Testament law, and I find that very interesting. Thanks for your thoughts, it’s encouraging to see other people out there willing to stand for what’s right, and it’s because of the Bible.
D.S | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Wow....
This guy had the mental capacity to KILL another person simply because he disagreed with them. What if he comes across a Jewish patient? Will they get the same treatment as a non-Jewish patient from him? He is obviously very passionate when his opinion is involved. He is bound to come across someone who is just as passionate be it a patient or a co-worker. Will he be able to restrain himself?
Candace Rodriguez | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Killer Doctor
I think checking to see if the med-student really was a neo-Nazi should be a factor in whether or not this guy is allowed to practice medicine. If we KNOW this man wants to kill all Jews and advance the Arian race, then we may want to re-think allowing him to be a doctor. Eventually, one day, a Jew may need medical care, and could this man be trusted to give them good care?
Aside from that, it sounds to me like this man has some serious character flaws that would make me uneasy about being a patient of his. From the story we know that he has a temper, he will not abide anyone disagreeing with him (what if someone goes for a second opinion somewhere?). He lies and has killed at least one person. So let him go to med-school if he wants, but the only fair thing to do would be to warn his patients about his behavior, so they at least know what they are getting themselves into when dealing with him.
Mary | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Hate crime
I feel that this person was convicted of a hate crime. He killed a person whose politics he disagreed with! A person who could to that should not be permitted to be practice medicine, a profession where a person has a very unique ability to alter the course of another person’s life for better or worse. The fact that this person also falsified information, while I can’t blame him for wanting to change his name after committing murder and doing time, shows he is no ready to be truthful, another important requirement for the medical profession.
claire Callahan Goodman | 1 year, 4 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
< 1 2 3 > (3 pages)