Killer Doctor
If your doctor was a convicted killer, would you trust him with your life?
Karl Svensson’s future as a doctor seemed certain when he was accepted to medical school at Sweden’s prestigious Karolinska Institute.
Famed for choosing the annual winners of the Nobel Prize in medicine, Karolinska hand-picked its medical students, selecting an elite group best suited for grappling with the ethics of life-or-death decisions and leading lives devoted to saving others.
But four months into Svensson’s studies, the 31 year-old’s future became unhinged by his past: would-be doctor Karl Svensson had killed a man.
Karolinska officials received two anonymous letters informing them that Svensson had been convicted of murder seven years earlier, shooting to death a trade union worker, in part because Svensson disagreed with the man’s politics. At the time, Svensson had been under surveillance by Sweden’s equivalent of the FBI for neo-Nazi involvement. Police classified the killing as a hate crime.
Svensson maintained his innocence, but was sentenced to 11 years in prison. After six and a half years, he was paroled, and soon accepted to med school.
The medical school could not expel Svensson because there was no government policy allowing for such action under the circumstances. Only when officials discovered that Svensson had falsified his high school transcripts by changing his last name from Hellekant—his legal name under which he was convicted—could they expel him. They did.
But students and officials remained divided. Some argued that a killer should never be allowed to practice medicine. Others said that since Svensson had served his time, he should be permitted to stay in school and become a doctor.
Tell us what you think: Should a man who was responsible for murder be allowed to be a doctor with the responsibility for saving people’s lives? Is it possible for a person to make a responsible contribution to society after making the most heinous one?
Add Comment Share This
Comments
What does Svensson have to say?
I believe if we aspire to be civilized we should rehabilitate criminals and forgive. I believe a person can change. However, the crime Hellekant-Svensson was convicted of is distressing. Neo-Nazism ideology is toxic. My beloved fiance was murdered in Denmark by skin-heads. The Danish government did nothing to acknowledge the hate-factor. So I have no idea where the killers are now. But in Svenssons’ case, he has gone through medical school … it suggests he wants to help others. What does he have to say now? Does he want to redeem himself? Is he a good doctor?
Sue Wood | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
WOW
I would not like to have a killer treat me or my family whether he served time or not, who’s to say he won’t kill again?
ARIEL | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
God's standard for a murder is death sentence not
I would never trust such a man. If a man killed another man, who is made in the image of God, he becomes dangerous. He can do it again, just like jumping from a high cliff, or parachute. God’s law demands payment with life for life, not some 6 years in a room where you read books, watch tv and lift weights! What is that? Justice? And being a doctor? It betrays the profession! During Nazi regime, doctors did gruesome things to supposedly speed up the discovery of ‘life saving’ cures. Give me a break. Ends don’t justify the means!
viktor | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
God's Law?
Viktor, I’m confused at how anyone could know what “God’s Law” is. We can only aspire to live good lives. I don’t know if the doctor in question is good or bad. All I’m saying is let’s give him an opportunity to say something. Again, I am worried about your tone. Who are you to determine a death sentence? Who are any of us to do that?? My dear cyber friend, I have lost many loved ones to violent crimes. And I’m grateful for my ability to forgive the terrible act – and pray the person will redeem themself. I lived in Palestine for a year … and regularly prayed that one terrible act would go un-avenged. Isn’t that what a civilized society is about? ~Sue
Sue Wood | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
huh?
A life for a life was the law in the old testament of the Bible. If you kill someone you seal their fate.I don’t believe this man should get the death penalty,I don’t think two wrongs make a right. However, I don’t think this man should practice medicine.God will deal with him on judgement day.
terrance tattrie | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
punish for ife
I’m not sure we should punish this guy for life…it states he plead innocent and was found guilty..if we punish everyone for life then w eall be guiltyof being a speeder in cars, or such. I do think he did his time so he should be able to moveon withlife…my son is very similar and his life is ruined altho he di dnotkill he cannotlocate work due to his charge for consensual sex. http://www.rickyslife.com also to the lady above sorry your fiance was murdered my thoughts are with you
Mary Duval | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
he could be the one
This doc was found guilty of murder but who is to say he would not be the one to find a cue for cancer? Alzheimers? So because he lied on his application this is why he was kicked out of school? Can he go to another one?
Mary Duval | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Killer Doctor
Normally I would be of the mind that a person can pay their debt to society and then should be afforded the opportunity to contribute positively. This situation is compounded by the fact that the killing was a ‘hate crime.’ I would be concerned that his feelings would be reflected in which patients he decided to save or help.
Janne Robbins | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
find another career
He’s a murderer and he’s dishonest. I don’t believe these are great characteristics for a doctor.
terrance tattrie | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Better Choices since then...
I don’t really blame him for going by a different name — it could signify that by choosing a new name he has chosen a new life.
But I wonder a few things… Did he legally change his last name, or did he just make one up? Did he choose to be a doctor to “atone” for his past mistakes? And if he still maintains his innocence and he still served the time… Well, I would give him a chance. His past might unfortunately warrant extra observation during school and work, to be sure he doesn’t impose his morals on his patients.
But I think the choices he seems to have made since this thing in his past would point toward his desire for a better future.
Dani O'Malley | 1 year, 7 months ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
1 2 3 > (3 pages)