Ballhawks: Foul Ball?
When Florida Marlins rookie Chris Coghlan hit his first major league home run this season, the ball was caught by a fan—and caught in a standoff between ballpark rights and doing the right thing.
After his victory lap, Coghlan requested that the milestone ball be returned for sentimental reasons. “I wanted to get it and give it to my mom,” he said. But the fan countered, “What’s the ball worth to you?”
The fan, 30 year-old Nick Yohanek, was legally entitled to keep the ball, but as a professional “ballhawk,” his stance was criticized all the way from the local Palm Beach Post to the Wall Street Journal, which described the business of ballhawks as “grabbing any ball that goes in the stands, especially milestone home runs like a player’s first or 500th. Most then refuse to give them back to the player unless he coughs up something valuable in return, from a signed bat or jersey to up to $10,000.”
A fan who caught and kept Ken Griffey’s 600th home run ball last year auctioned it for $42,000. And the man who refused to hand over Mark McGwire’s 70th homerun ball during the 1998 season later sold it for $3 million.
Negotiations to free Chris Coghlan’s treasured piece of memorabilia soon involved the Marlins manager, coach, media relations head, and team psychologist, and focused on free tickets to future Marlins games, a photo op, a signed ball, and two signed bats, one which Yohanek wanted inscribed, “To Nick, thanks for catching my first home run!”
Coghlan eventually got his ball back. “He wasn’t the most polite or respectful guy about the whole process,” Coghlan said, likening the ballhawk’s actions to holding balls “for ransom.”
Yohanek disagreed. “It’s my hobby, people,” he wrote on his blog, along with this summation. “QUESTION: Is it okay to catch a historic milestone home run and sell it at auction for $1 million dollars? ANSWER: If that’s what it’s worth to someone, hell yeah it’s okay.”
Tell us what you think: Ballhawking is legal, so does it matter if it’s responsible or not? Does baseball need new rules for fans?
Add Comment Share This
Comments
Ballhawkers or Charity??
I think its sad that someone would do that…Yohanek’s question, is it okay to catch a historic ball and sell it for a million dollars? If someone will pay, hell yeah!..
Well, that shows his immaturity and self centered nature. You could ask…is it okay to kidnap a kid and ransom it back for a million dollars? If someone will pay…
Its just flawed logic. I think that all balls should be returned to the park and players get first rights to it and then it goes on to a charitable auction of the players choosing.
I am betting most players would give something to charity anyway, but this is anotehr way they could make a contribution beyond their sport.
David Farr | 3 weeks ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Gift vs. Entitlement
Easy does it. The hostage analogy is going way too far.
We must remember that the ball never belonged to Mr. Coghlan. It no more belonged to him than the stapler on my desk at work belongs to me. And the moment it went into the stands two things happened nearly simultaneously. Mr. Yohanek became the owner of the ball, and Mr. Coghlan developed a very strong sentimental attachment to this same ball.
Mr. Coghlan was now in the awkward position of wanting — very badly it seems — someone else’s property. Custom may dictate that the ball be “gifted” to the ballplayer, but the rookie seemed to feel entitled, even owed, this gift from a person he had never met, never served and whose trust he never earned.
Sure Mr. Yohanek was a self-confessed ballhawk, but he was also a fan and in the end gave up the ball for mostly non-monetary compensation. Had the rookie acted like someone asking an underserved service from a stranger, he may have encountered less resistance.
Kenneth | 1 week, 3 days ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Overnight thought
It used to be that professional baseball players could recover “landmark balls” in exchange for little more than a handshake. We wonder about the increasing value of memorabilia that seems to have currupted fans. But what about the other side of this economic equation? Professional athletes might choose to ask themselves what has driven down the value of their handshakes.
Kenneth Polsky | 1 week, 3 days ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
me
Maybe it is good for business for fans to go to games … David Farr above says it well … catching a foul ball has always been a big attraction for a fan … give me ?? get yours ?? How do we resolve our conflicts ?
Ric McMillion | 6 days, 1 hour ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
IT Manager
This is what we’ve come to? Arguing about a baseball when there are so many more important things occurring in the world? Is this a way for people to distract themselves from more significant things in order to allow themselves from having to responsible for doing something that would really matter? This is just a sad commentary on the state of American ignorance.
Sam Torke | 4 days, 13 hours ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
BALL HAWK vs BALL OWNER
I have an idea, the teams should add “implied consent” to all ticket purchasers, that all foulballs, homeruns, etc must be surrendered to the ushers or team representatives! Then watch how the ticket sales decline.
Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it? This souvenir baseball tradition has existed, probably, as long as there have been major leagues. This tradition is due in part because the baseball that has been impacted with home run force and out of the park is no longer suitable for use in major league play. I believe another reason is exactly what has occurred in this incident, an incentive that a fan will come away with a once in a lifetime memento. Our society seems to have a hunger for souvenirs or mementos, therefore some entrepeneurs will pay large sums a notable one.
I recall many years ago when the Kansas City Athletics were our major leaguers. One of the kids in the neighborhood had been to an exciting visit to the old Municipal Stadium in Kansas City, and had managed to retrieve a foul ball. I remember the boy proudly showing it around the neighborhood with excitement emanating from all parts of his being. When I asked him the name of the player who had hit the ball, he proudly state “Larry Doby”.
I was not a great sports fan at the time so the name meant little to me. I later learned just how significant this Baseball star was to what we now know as modern major league baseball.
Larry Doby was a native of Camden, South Carolina, he was the second black player to play in the modern major leagues and the first to do so in the American League. A center fielder, Doby appeared in seven All-Star games and finished second in the 1954 American League MVP voting. Appointed manager of the Chicago White Sox in 1978, Doby was the second African-American to lead a Major League club. He was selected to the Baseball Hall of Fame in 1998 by the Hall’s Veterans Committee.
No one came forward to ask or demand for that kid to give back the baseball. I have lost touch with that kid over the years, but I think I could probably wager that he still has that baseball. The value of that ball to him, I am certain, is more than just a trading commodity would be to a “ballhawk”.
Bill McDonald | 4 days, 13 hours ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
ballhawks
I can understand the part of the fun of the sport would be to catch a ball in the stands by a player. But a milestone ball should be graciously returned to the player for him to do what he wishes with it.
I feel if he got an autographed picture with the player or a pic of the fan catching that ball, that should be sufficient.
Players should not have to fight, nor pay to have milestone balls returned to them.
donna martin | 4 days, 12 hours ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
take the fans out of the stadium
i was surprised to see that i am the only one to see that holds the opinion that it is the fans ball. if the pro wants his first ball back he can ask but he can’t insist. i don’t know if chris coughlins mom will have one of his 4 lifetime homeruns or if it will be the first of 500 and the next mickey mantle. the world is full of people, some nice , some jerks and you can not impose moral judgement on those around you. if the baseball parks wants to implement a no jerks allowed rule yankee stadium would be empty.
tim jones | 4 days, 11 hours ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Lottery
When I was a kid I used to go to games with my dad and I would always bring my baseball MItt. I caught a foul ball once in Mets stadium. I kept it to this day. I would not expect to give it back, nor is the player who hit the ball entitled to it. If I could get a million for a ball off players who earn millions more than m,ost folks would earn in a lifetime, then more power to me.
There is no marals to baseball, or do none of you remember the strike a few years back. To heck with ‘em should have sold the bal;l back to him for half his first year salary.
David M Myles | 4 days, 11 hours ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
Seriously?
The ball is undeniably the full property of the one who caught it, and being such, he can throw it back, keep it, give it to the player, sell it, wrap it up as a gift, whatever. I agree, most of these players make more money than we will see in a lifetime to play what is mostly thought of as a children’s game, and I’d bet my life they are having the time of their life! It’s fun, or it should be. Sure, they work hard at being good at what they do, but they’re having fun. I’m a huge baseball fan, and in the 40 years of games I have seen, each time in the back of my mind is the thought that maybe I will get a ball THIS time. I never have, but it would be a dream come true, and if they want it, they should pay a respectable sum or make some other fair deal so both people are satisfied and happy, I mean, they are already living a life most of us can only dream of!!! Spread the happiness around a little.
Staci Wilson | 4 days, 9 hours ago
Add Comment | Post Reply
1 2 > (2 pages)