Skip to content ↓


The Responsibility Project®. Exploring what it means to do the right thing

Thursday Sep 09


Are Ball Parks Too Dangerous?

112 Comments

March 25, 2008 by Kathy McManus

Are Ball Parks Too Dangerous?

Laura Kerod had great seats. 

She and her husband Kevin were cheering for their local New Jersey minor league baseball team—the Trenton Thunder—sitting enviably close to the dugout. 

Ms. Kerod turned to check the score board, then turned back. “And boom, it hit me,” she said of the foul ball that slammed into her face, ripping her lip, shattering her teeth, and fracturing her palate. 

Between doctor visits and surgeries, the Kerod’s started contacting politicians and circulating a petition, advocating for changes that would make a trip to the ballpark safer, including more protective netting and medical coverage for injured spectators.

To which baseball officials replied, read your ticket--there’s an inherent risk from stray bats and balls that’s spelled out and also announced before each game. 

But baseball has a special appeal to families, countered Mr. Kerod. Kids and parents don’t read their tickets at the baseball stadium. “Families should be able to go there and feel safe,” Mr. Kerod said. “When you go there, you see police, and they’re protecting you from terrorism. Who is protecting us from bats and balls?” 

Another New Jersey baseball fan disagreed. “With great seats comes great responsibility” he stated. “You, the spectator, must take personal responsibility for your safety.” 

Tell us what you think--should the responsibility for such a serious injury be the responsibility of the fan? Does America’s favorite pastime need to be made safer for the people sitting in the seats?


Share this short URL /// http://sharerp.com/1l

 


112 Comments

What do you think? Leave a comment

  • March 26, 2008 by LibertyJen

    When are we going to come to the understanding that holding others responsible for our decisions is not the next ticket to wealth. Our society is too quick to blame others and to file suits to make amends. There is danger inherent in life, that is why an accident is just that: an accident. In this case, it is the responsibility of the fan. If a suit were decided on the behalf of the fans, it simply continues to drive up the cost of the rest of us to go to the games. If you want to be safe, hide out in your basement. To experience life is to invite some level of risk.

    Reply

    • April 9, 2008 by Mike Purcell

      I could not agree more!! Our court's are to tied up as it is with frivolous law suites. We defiently don't need to make America's past time tainted anymore than it already is by involving America's new favorite past time frivolous law suites!!!

      Reply

    • July 14, 2008 by chris marien

      Liberty Jen hit it right on the head. Nascar drivers take a great risk for the possibility of a big paycheck. Like the baseball fan w/ front-row seats, they trade in the safety of the bleachers for the glamour and status of the front row. If you get hit, maybe you should have been paying better attention. Go hide in your basement and feel safe.....sounds like a blast.

      Reply

      • June 4, 2010 by Deborah

        Last year at a Colorado Rockies/Cubs game during the 2nd Inning and sitting right next to the cement wall in right field a line drive foulball was hit right at me as I was looking directly at the batter. That ball was moving so fast I never saw it coming. Broke 2 of my fingers, one knuckle and bruised my top right rib. The Rockies Organization took really good care of me in the First aid room. I was back watching the game by the 4th Inning. They wanted me to go to the hospital but I waved it off and got back to my game. It's a chance you take being that close to the field. I must say I have a greater appriciation of what the players do on the field after my experience!

    • June 9, 2010 by Steven Schultz

      Though I feel bad that this fan was injured at the game I too believe it is the responsibility of the fan to stay engaged in the game and aware of the potential of injury. I do not feel it is the responsibility of the stadium or the team to rectify this fan's bills due to the injury. I have attended ballgames in every major league city and am amazed that there are not more injuries due to foul balls/bats screaming into the stands. I watch(and i am not saying this is what happened in this case) people in the most at risk seats barely paying attention to the game and wonder how there is not more injuries. When i was a kid i was told to always watch the play - especially with a player at bat for the very reason of not being caught off guard by a foul ball. It is clearly stated on your ticket and reinforced at all ballparks prior to the start of the game to pay attention. People - PAY ATTENTION!!

      Reply

    • June 10, 2010 by PRISCILLA WALSH

      I AGREE. I SAT BEHIND THE CUBS DOUGOUT FOR YEARS AND NEVER A PROBLEM. YOU TAKE YOUR CHANCES IN A LOT OF THINGS, AND DON'T EXPECT REMUNATION.

      Reply

    • July 1, 2010 by Dave Duncan

      While I feel sorry that anyone is hurt at a baseball game, especially a lady, I also feel most strongly that if you have chosen to attend a live game, well then you have also chosen to be there mentally as well as physically and play an active role in your own safety. Many yearn for the opportunity to "shag" some fouls, or even the thrill of catching a home run in the stands; they are probably wishing that they could have had the good fortuneof a ball coming their way! All that I have to say, is if youdon't want to catch it, then you should have ducked! Dave Duncan Redbirds fan, not pitching coach!

      Reply

  • March 26, 2008 by terry bluntt

    At the risk of sounding obvious: bats and balls are a requirement of baseball; 'terrorists' (who have never, as far as I'm aware, shown up at a baseball game) are not. We can't deny that Ms. Kerod's injury is unfortunate. And I don't think we can deny that she should be properly looked after - by the state or by an insurance policy (the two are, after all, essentially the same). But to take a sport that is inherently fairly safe and try to make it safer is a fool's errand. Risk is inherent in everything we do. It is a requirement of the human condition. If we reduced risk to a negligible level - even if it were possible - I'm guessing we'd all lose our marbles.

    Reply

  • March 31, 2008 by terrance tattrie

    Where I grew up the seats behind home plate and the seats behind each dugout were protected by a fence that was probably fifteen feet high. I'm thinking they probably did this because SOMEONE GOT HIT!! Isn't this pretty much just common sense?

    Reply

    • April 3, 2008 by Gene C

      I agree with fencing directly behind home plate. Both the Catcher and Umpire wear protection for a reason. In regards to fencing forward of the batter I do not agree. I certainly wouldn't want to be the season ticket holder, paying top dollar for the best seats, only to find out that I now have an obstructed views because of the fence supports? Like someone mentioned earlier there are certain risks in life and as a fan you should know when to pay attention and when to peek at the scoreboard.

      Reply

      • June 4, 2010 by Damon Turner

        I agree theres plenty of time to glance at the scoreboard, afer a strike, after a ball, afer a hit or a foul even a strikeout. The one time you DONT look at the scoreboard in a drunken stare is during a pitchers delivery. HELLO?

    • April 15, 2008 by Frank Lowell

      I am 56 and have been to many baseball games. While there is ALWAYS netting behind home plate I have NEVER seen any behind dugouts, nor should there be any.

      Reply

      • April 16, 2008 by Mr. Met

        Not in the majors but little league games have fences like this...
  • March 31, 2008 by Steve Lord

    It's not on TV. You are at a sporting event where you can get hurt if you aren't looking at things that could come and hit you in the face. Most ball games I have been to have more foul balls into the stands than they have hits into the park. I don't think any of the players were looking at the scoreboard when someone was being pitched to. Fans who want to be in on the action with front row seats need to pay attention.

    Reply

    • April 7, 2008 by Dani O'Malley

      I couldn't have said it better. If you buy the tickets, you assume the risk. Pay Attention!

      Reply

  • April 1, 2008 by Staceyp-rn

    I have to admit some frustration with "they" should make (fill in the blank ) safer, easier, etc. Over the last 50 years of my life I have watched the government, companies, and individuals clamor for more safety, more regulations, more protection, and then hear complaints about "big brother" interference. Anyone who has ever attended a baseball game whether in their own neighborhood, or in an events stadium has seen foul balls fly into the stands. For that matter, there are those who deliberately wear their gloves in the hopes of a "fly" coming their way. Why should we wrap the audience in plastic because someone didn't bother to read their ticket? (BTW, I do read those silly things) We are warned everyday about liability limits on the back of ticket stubs whether from the ballpark, the dry cleaners or the parking garage where we leave our car. Life has risks, you have to take personal responsibility for the choices you make and the risks you choose and then don't blame someone when something goes wrong. Stuff happens.

    Reply

  • April 3, 2008 by Daniel Bembower

    Accidents are preventable, and there is such a thing as safety. And just because "stuff happens" doesn't mean it had to happen. Stadium owners have a responsibility to provide a safe environment in which patrons (fans) can enjoy themselves. In my opinion, this responsibility extends to providing adequate netting to protect fans from line drives. There's a reason players on-deck must wear helmets, and a reason why there's netting in front of the dug-out as well. This does not absolve fans from their responsibility to act in a safe manner, but I certainly do not expect any fan to watch every pitch, no matter where they are sitting. While many ballparks are adding additional netting, and I feel all should consider this additional protection, the inclusion of netting or liability for medical expenses should NOT be legislated or forced upon ballpark owners. There is (and should be) a large gap between what is legal and what is responsible.

    Reply

    • April 11, 2008 by Joe Onderick

      As pretty much everyone else stated, if you got to the game, pay attention!! Stadium owners provide as safe an environment as they can without taking away the ambience of the game itself. They don't put nets in front of the dugouts, they put them behind home plate as this is a tough spot to sit in & react quick enough to protect yourself if needed. That is why the umps & the catchers where masks. Batters in the on-deck circle wear helmsts because they are batting next & are much closer to the batter than anyone else (next to the catcher & home plate umpire). You have an obligation as a fan to pay attention when necessary. It is the same as at a hockey game. When the puck is in play, pay attention. When the baseball is in play, pay attention. This is an obvious & common sense answer. Just imagine, next someone will want to sue someone because they spilled their hot coffee on themselves....oh wait, that already happened!!!!

      Reply

      • June 4, 2010 by Damon Turner

        You tell em' these guys who are advocating changes to the game obviously havent been to the game and enjoyed the atmosphere and take your kid with his or her glove and you with your glove, in hopes of snagging a souvinere, take away our hope of snagging a foul or a homer and ticket sales will plummit if you cant look at the scoreboard between innings or pitches, just stay home and watch on t.v. be careful with the remote control, or read about it in the paper watch out though, paper cuts can be nasty.

  • April 4, 2008 by brian duensing

    I am a minor league player at the AAA level. I have seen multiple balls go into the seats and I have seen multiple people get hit by foul balls. In fact on opening night (yesterday) a lady got hit in the face by a foul ball and she was on the upper deck behind home plate. The ball went over the backstop net and hit her. What I am getting at is basically what everybody else is saying. When you go to a game, no matter where you sit, you need to pay attention. The one thing I do think needs to be encouraged is an age limit of people allowed to sit right behind the dugout. Families that bring their young kids and sit right behind the dugout are just asking for trouble. The balls and bats go into the stands at an incredible rate and most people cant react fast enough. Just pay attention! Also I agree with the fact that we are quick to blame others. It is definitely not getting us anywhere. It is a freak thing that happened, unfortunately. As we say on the field "hang with em."

    Reply

    • April 9, 2008 by Dani O'Malley

      I love the way you think. An age limit would be wonderful. Children are less likely to pay attention, and more likely to cause those around them to pay less attention. An age limit -- ingenious!!

      Reply

  • April 8, 2008 by dearsportsmom.com

    Growing up watching the Angels play in Anaheim and as the mother of two sons who play baseball (one pitching at a Division 1 college and the other in high school) I have been a spectator at more than my share of games. There is definitely a risk that one accepts by sitting near a baseball field, and it is in your best interest to pay attention. Yes, there should be appropriate protection at the field to prevent accidents. However, the choice to attend a game is up to the individual attending. I have sat in great seats behind dugouts, knowing that if I failed to pay attention for a moment I was putting myself at risk. I learned more about the game in the process - it helps to know which direction the foul balls are likely to go if the hitter is left or right handed. In most cases, a spectator has a choice in where he or she sits and can limit the risks. There are usually seats available in the upper decks of big stadiums or in the distance at Little League and school fields. Accidents are unfortunate, but it is our choice to participate. I worry about my sons getting hit by a ball being hit off a metal bat, but I understand that it is a risk we choose to accept in order to play the game.

    Reply

  • April 8, 2008 by Neil Leibowitz

    It amazes me how many people sit close to the action, and don't pay attention to the game. When sitting close up, you cannot take your eye off the ball, and you can't turn your back on the field except in-between innings. People who want to mitigate this risk can sit in the outfield or the upper deck. Its scary when I see a young mother holding a baby, sitting behind the dugout, and talking to her friend sitting behind her with a player up at bat.

    Reply

  • April 11, 2008 by jim smith

    i have watched my San Jose giants play Cucamonga and see two little old ladies get smacked by foulers, and get taken by ambulance. i have been screamed at by balls behind the foul screen directly behind home plate at the concession in Elsinore. i have also had a foul fly go right behind my back into my seat pocket at a Irvine /Santa Clara game. a foul ball pinballing at speed in the stands is a dangerous thing. that is why it is printed on the ticket you risk yourself. don't like it, don't go. Thats baseball.

    Reply

  • April 12, 2008 by Famous Former Catcher

    The Catcher and Umpire behind home plate are protected, with the required safety equipment, so should the spectators behind home plate watching the game

    Reply

    • April 13, 2008 by Neil Leibowitz

      Interestingly, the catcher and plate umpire wear padding and masks, the batter and the player in the on deck circle do not. They are expected to pay attention. Last year Juan Encarnacion got hit in the face by a foul ball while in the on deck circle....he may never play again due to the injury to his eye. While not very common, this is considered part of the game. As a fan who loves the game, on days when I don't want to worry about foul balls, or thrown bats, I'll sit behind the screen or in the upper deck. But if I choose to sit behind the dugout, I bring a glove, and don't take my eye off the ball.

      Reply

    • July 30, 2008 by Dave Washburn

      You say the spectators behind home plate should be protected. They are... by a giant net!

      Reply

    • June 4, 2010 by Damon Turner

      You see my point exactly these knuckle heads have never been to a baseball game or they would KNOW that there is a giant net BEHIND the plate. I strongly suspect that this was the FIRST TIME this lady had been to a game, or even knew what baseball is about or how it is played!!! Hell of a lesson on the game.

      Reply

  • April 13, 2008 by Greg Harris

    In this sue happy America; this is just another case of let society pay for my decisions. If I choose to go to a ball game and get hit in the face by a rogue foul ball that is my problem, just like if I choose to smoke I face the chance of getting lung cancer. People need to start being held accountable for their actions. Ignorance is not an exception to the law. My suggestion, next time pay attention to the game and bring a glove.

    Reply

    • April 13, 2008 by chad spahr

      Funny, but seldom do you ever hear of a kid getting hit with a bat or a ball. maybe it should be mandatory that anyone over 21 should be accompanied by a kid to a baseball game.

      Reply



Tell us what you think.

Let the world know what you think, but please do so responsibly. Comments are moderated and we will not post personal attacks, obscene language or inappropriate material, comments with links, or comments from people under the age of 18. If you have a question, check out our Comment Submission Guidelines.

why are we asking for this?

By clicking submit, you agree to our site’s Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.


Find More ///


Related ///

Fashion Police: The Case of the Sagging Pants

Across the U.S., teens are being jailed for violating law against “sagging pants” and other forms of “indecent exposure.” Is this responsible lawmaking?

Overcoming Inspiration Deficit

A Beliefnet guide to doing your best by getting “unstuck.”

Coverages For Teachers


From vandalism protection for your car parked in the school parking lot to dealing with theft of school materials from your car, Liberty Mutual offers special coverages for teachers – all at no additional cost.

2099 Driving Game

Think you can win a race in the year 2099? Take our new futuristic game out for a spin.

2099 Driving Game

Schools for the Poorest

Babar Ali, a teenager in India’s West Bengal region, has started a free school for the poorest children in his village.

Table Guardians

What are we supposed to do when a stranger says, Excuse me, can you watch my things?

Table Guardians

A Check for Doing Good

Rethinking a government program that pays the poor for “good behavior.”




About Liberty Mutual

Liberty Mutual is a provider of auto, home, and life insurance for consumers, as well as risk and disability products and services for businesses. Because responsibility is integral to who we are, we also support a range of community service programs around issues like fire safety and responsible sports. Through the Liberty Mutual Foundation, we make grants to organizations that show low-income students a path to lifelong success through education, and agencies that provide immediate basic health and human services to the needy. To learn more about us, visit us at LibertyMutualGroup.com

© 2010 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 175 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116